Paul Daley
Daley
United Kingdom flag
May 13 2022
Friday

SSE Arena, London, United Kingdom

Bellator 281
3 rounds contest @ Welterweight
Wendell Giacomo
Giacomo
Brazil flag
42-18-0
KO 2
KO 2
0-0-0

The tape

39
Age
28
5' 9" / 176 cm
Height
5' 10" / 178 cm
76" / 193 cm
Reach
N/A

Tape record

UDKOKOUDUD
Form
UDSUBSUBKOKO
42
Wins
0
34
By KO
0
81
KO%
0
0
By SUB
0
0
SUB%
0
18
Loses
0
2
Stopped
0
6
Tapped
0
2
Draws
0
2003
Debut
N/A
62
Bouts
0
127
Rounds
0
8 hours, 48 minutes
Fight Time
0 seconds

Tape rankings @ Welterweight

-
UFC
-
8
Bellator
-
-
Tapology
-

Paul Daley vs Wendell Giacomo report

Who won Daley vs Giacomo?

Paul Daley beat Wendell Giacomo by during the main card of Bellator 281, on Friday 13th May 2022 at SSE Arena in London.

The scorecards were announced as in favor of winner Paul Daley.

The fight was scheduled to take place over 3 rounds in the Welterweight division, which meant the weight limit was 170 pounds (12.1 stone or 77.1 KG).

Daley vs Giacomo stats

Paul Daley stepped into the octagon with a record of 42 wins, 18 loses and 2 draws, 34 of those wins coming by the way of knock out.

Wendell Giacomo made his way to the cage with an unblemished record of 0 wins and 0 draws.

The stats suggested Daley had a massive power advantage over Giacomo, boasting at 81% knock out percentage over Giacomo's 0%.

If the fight went to the ground, their records suggested that Daley and Giacomo would have been pretty equal, both with a 0% submission rate.

Paul Daley was the older man by 11 years, at 39 years old.

Giacomo had a height advantage of 1 inch over Daley.

Daley was arguably the more experienced fighter, having had 62 more fights, and made his debut in 2003, 19 year and 4 months later than Giacomo, whose first professional fight was in . He had fought 109 more professional rounds, 129 to Giacomo's 20.

Activity check

What were the odds on Daley vs Giacomo?

Sorry, we couldn’t find any historical odds for Daley vs Giacomo.

Also on this card

Paul Daley vs Wendell Giacomo news

Comments

Leave a Reply