Oban Elliott
Elliott
Sep 30 2021
Thursday

York Hall, London, England

Cage Warriors 127
3 rounds contest @ Welterweight
George McManus
McManus
United Kingdom flag
3-1-0
KO 1
KO 1
2-2-0

The tape

Age
N/A
Height
6' 2" / 188 cm
N/A
Reach
N/A

Tape record

Form
3
Wins
2
1
By KO
0
33
KO%
0
2
By SUB
2
67
SUB%
100
1
Loses
2
1
Stopped
2
0
Tapped
0
0
Draws
0
2019
Debut
2018
4
Bouts
4
7
Rounds
6
25 minutes, 46 seconds
Fight Time
21 minutes, 50 seconds

Tape rankings @ Welterweight

-
UFC
-
-
Bellator
-
-
Tapology
-

Oban Elliott vs George McManus report

Who won Elliott vs McManus?

Oban Elliott beat George McManus by , during the main card of Cage Warriors 127, on Thursday 30th September 2021 at York Hall in London.

The scorecards were announced as in favor of winner Oban Elliott.

The fight was scheduled to take place over 3 rounds in the Welterweight division, which meant the weight limit was 170 pounds (12.1 stone or 77.1 KG).

Elliott vs McManus stats

Oban Elliott stepped into the ring with a record of 3 wins, 1 loss and 0 draws, 1 of those wins coming by the way of knock out and 2 by submission.

George McManus made his way to the ring with a record of 2 wins, 2 loses and 0 draws and 2 by submission.

The stats suggested Elliott had a massive power advantage over McManus, boasting at 33% knock out percentage over McManus' 0%.

Oban Elliott was the same age as George McManus, at years old.

Elliott was arguably the more experienced fighter, having had the same amount of fights, and made his debut in 2019, 9 months later than McManus, whose first professional fight was in 2018. He had fought 4 more professional rounds, 11 to McManus' 7.

Activity check

Elliott's last 3 fights had come over a period of 4 years, 2 months and 21 days, meaning he had been fighting on average every 1 year, 4 months and 29 days. In those fights, he fought a total of 7 rounds, meaning that they had lasted 2.3 rounds on average.

Also on this card

Oban Elliott vs George McManus news

Sorry, we couldn't find any news for Elliott vs McManus.

Comments

Leave a Reply