Who won Matthews vs Fialho?
Jake Matthews beat Andre Fialho by during the main card of UFC 275, on Saturday 11th June 2022 at Singapore Indoor Stadium in Singapore.
The scorecards were announced as in favor of winner Jake Matthews.
The fight was scheduled to take place over 3 rounds in the Welterweight division, which meant the weight limit was 170 pounds (12.1 stone or 77.1 KG).
Matthews vs Fialho stats
Jake Matthews stepped into the octagon with a record of 17 wins, 5 loses and 0 draws, 4 of those wins coming by the way of knock out and 7 by submission.
Andre Fialho made his way to the cage with a record of 16 wins, 4 loses and 0 draws, with 13 of those wins by knock out and 1 by submission.
The stats suggested Fialho had a massive power advantage over Matthews, boosting at 81% knock out percentage over Matthews' 24%.
If the fight went to the ground, their records suggested Matthews had a massive advantage over Fialho, boasting at 41% submission rate over Fialho's 6%.
Jake Matthews was the same age as Andre Fialho, at 29 years old.
Matthews had a height advantage of 1 inch over Fialho. Despite this, Fialho had 2-inch reach advantage.
Matthews was the more experienced professional fighter, having had 2 more fights, and made his debut in 2012, 1 year and 10 months earlier than Fialho, whose first professional fight was in 2014. He had fought 15 more professional rounds, 59 to Fialho's 44.
Activity check
Matthews' last 3 fights had come over a period of 6 years, 4 months and 9 days, meaning he had been fighting on average every 2 years, 1 month and 12 days. In those fights, he fought a total of 9 rounds, meaning that they had lasted 3 rounds on average.
Fialho's last 4 fights had come over a period of 3 years, 5 months and 25 days, meaning he had been fighting on average every 10 months and 14 days. In those fights, he fought a total of 8 rounds, meaning that they had lasted 2 rounds on average.
What were the odds on Matthews vs Fialho?
Sorry, we couldn’t find any historical odds for Matthews vs Fialho.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.