Ryan Fillingame
Fillingame
United States flag
Mar 04 2022
Friday

Del Mar Arena, San Diego, United States

Cage Warriors 133
3 rounds contest @ Featherweight
Damon Wilson
Wilson
United States flag
6-4-0
KO 1
KO 1
0-0-0

The tape

31
Age
29
5' 9" / 175 cm
Height
5' 9" / 175 cm
N/A
Reach
N/A

Tape record

Form
6
Wins
0
1
By KO
0
17
KO%
0
1
By SUB
0
17
SUB%
0
4
Loses
0
2
Stopped
0
0
Tapped
0
0
Draws
0
2016
Debut
N/A
10
Bouts
0
26
Rounds
0
1 hours, 58 minutes
Fight Time
0 seconds

Tape rankings @ Featherweight

-
UFC
-
-
Bellator
-
-
Tapology
-

Ryan Fillingame vs Damon Wilson report

Who won Fillingame vs Wilson?

Damon Wilson beat Ryan Fillingame by , during the main card of Cage Warriors 133, on Friday 4th March 2022 at Del Mar Arena in San Diego.

The scorecards were announced as in favor of winner Damon Wilson.

The fight was scheduled to take place over 3 rounds in the Featherweight division, which meant the weight limit was 145 pounds (10.4 stone or 65.8 KG).

Fillingame vs Wilson stats

Ryan Fillingame stepped into the ring with a record of 6 wins, 4 loses and 0 draws, 1 of those wins coming by the way of knock out and 1 by submission.

Damon Wilson made his way to the ring with an unblemished record of 0 wins and 0 draws.

The stats suggested Fillingame had advantage in power over Wilson, with a 17% knock out percentage over Wilson's 0%.

Ryan Fillingame was the older man by 2 years, at 31 years old.

Fillingame was arguably the more experienced fighter, having had 10 more fights, and made his debut in 2016, 6 year and 2 months later than Wilson, whose first professional fight was in . He had fought 26 more professional rounds, 26 to Wilson's 0.

Activity check

Wilson's last 2 fights had come over a period of 9 months and 21 days, meaning he had been fighting on average every 4 months and 27 days. In those fights, he fought a total of 3 rounds, meaning that they had lasted 1.5 rounds on average.

Also on this card

Ryan Fillingame vs Damon Wilson news

Sorry, we couldn't find any news for Fillingame vs Wilson.

Comments

Leave a Reply