Tape rankings @ Bantamweight
Magomed Magomedov vs Raufeon Stots report
Who won Magomedov vs Stots?
Raufeon Stots beat Magomed Magomedov by unanimous decision in their 3 round contest during the main card of Bellator 264, on Friday 13th August 2021 at Mohegan Sun Arena in Uncasville.
The scorecards were announced as 28-29, 27-30, 27-30 in favor of winner Raufeon Stots.
The fight was scheduled to take place over 3 rounds in the Bantamweight division, which meant the weight limit was 135 pounds (9.6 stone or 61.2 KG).
Magomedov vs Stots stats
Magomed Magomedov stepped into the octagon with a record of 17 wins, 1 loss and 0 draws, 4 of those wins coming by the way of knock out and 7 by submission.
Raufeon Stots made his way to the cage with a record of 15 wins, 1 loss and 0 draws, with 3 of those wins by knock out and 4 by submission.
The stats suggested Magomedov had a slight advantage in power over Stots, with a 24% knock out percentage over Stots' 20%.
If the fight went to the ground, their records suggested Magomedov had an advantage over Stots, with a 41% submission rate over Stots' 27%.
Magomed Magomedov was the younger man by 3 years, at 31 years old.
Magomedov was the more experienced professional fighter, having had 2 more fights, and made his debut in 2011, 4 years and 1 month earlier than Stots, whose first professional fight was in 2015. He had fought 4 more professional rounds, 52 to Stots' 48.
Magomedov's last 2 fights had come over a period of 2 years, 3 months and 14 days, meaning he had been fighting on average every 1 year, 1 month and 21 days. In those fights, he fought a total of 5 rounds, meaning that they had lasted 2.5 rounds on average.
Stots' last 4 fights had come over a period of 3 years, 9 months and 21 days, meaning he had been fighting on average every 11 months and 14 days. In those fights, he fought a total of 12 rounds, meaning that they had lasted 3 rounds on average.
What were the odds on Magomedov vs Stots?
Sorry, we couldn’t find any historical odds for Magomedov vs Stots.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.